Improving scientific knowledge on food contaminants to ensure safer products
Task Force Information
Objectives
Food contaminants present a serious risk to consumer health. Enhancing our understanding of them is essential. The Task Force focuses on:
- Advancing scientific knowledge on various contaminants, particularly assessing their impact on human health.
- Addressing research gaps in toxicity, exposure, and analytical aspects.
- Reviewing mitigation measures and supporting risk management strategies.
Task Force Members
| Neil Buck - Chair | General Mills | CH |
| Michele Suman – Vice-Chair | Barilla G&R Fratelli | IT |
| Ixchel Gilbert Sandoval | Arla Amba | DK |
| Karsten Harms | Südzucker Group | DE |
| Biljana Dimcic | AB InBev | BE |
| Si Wang | PepsiCo International | UK |
| Lucia Donnini | Importaco | ES |
| Gloria Pellegrino | Luigi Lavazza | IT |
| Agata Walczak | Soremartec | IT |
| Natalie Thatcher | Mondelēz International | UK |
| Mathilde Bergal | Danone | FR |
| Deepti Salvi | North Carolina State University | US |
| Raquel B. Gomez-Coca | National Research Council of Spain | ES |
| Osahon Osadolor | Cargill | BE |
| Anja Andersen | Arla AFI | DK |
| Annette Sansom | Campden BRI | UK |
| Danlei Wang | Flora Food Group | NL |
| Maria João Cunha | Delta Serviços | PT |
* Scientific Advisors
Contact Information
For more detailed information, please contact Konrad Korzeniowski at kkorzeniowski@ilsieurope.be
Activity Overview
Ongoing
- Update on Risk-Benefit Assessment of Foods: Approaches to Facilitate Application
An expert group on risk-benefits assessment of foods explores the reasons for limited application and seek practical solutions to increase the utility of this methodology in foods.
Start: Sep 2021 - End: Nov 2025
- Unintentional Substances in Food: Rapid Risk Assessment to inform Risk Management
As there is no harmonized approach between Food Businesses and other stakeholders on how to perform and communicate a rapid risk assessment, a toolkit will be proposed and provide a systematic approach for risk analysis of incidents, discussing the degree of uncertainties and will be informed by existing scientific guidancesand practical experience of the participants. Risk communication will also be addressed.
Start date: March 2025 - End date: Feb 2027
- Clarifying the Current Understanding of the Human Health Risk of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Food and Drinking Water to Enable Science-Based Communication and Risk Management
The research group is currently working on a systematic review of existing publications addressing the aspects of the current chemical grouping approaches for risk assessment to help understand whether it is appropriate for all PFAS to be effectively grouped together for risk management purposes, while also considering the sources and uses of these substances across food supply chains.
Start date: February 2026 - End date: July 2027
In the Pipeline
- Guidance on Contaminant Management for Food Business Operators
Expert Groups
Update on Risk-Benefit Assessment of foods: approaches to facilitate application
Background and Objectives
All foods contain chemical and biological impurities some of which may be viewed as contaminants of toxicological or microbiological relevance, depending on the definition used. Classical risk assessment does not reconcile the benefit to health of the food against the potential effects of the contaminants or the impact of mitigation measures that may be applied to reduce contaminants. A contaminant-centric view of a food can result in an incomplete understanding of the net health benefits of food by groups such as policy makers.
As such, methods for the comparison between benefits and risks have been developed, including the publication of guidance materials. Despite the availability of guidance, there have been a limited number of examples of risk-benefit analysis being used as an input for the risk management of foods by food safety agencies.
Output
This activity will review the evolution and application of risk-benefit assessment since its infancy, and thereby understand:
- Why risk-benefit assessment has not been more widely applied by food safety agencies in Europe?
- What are the available applications of RBA since the publication of guidance and what are the lessons learned?
- Whether existing guidance can be amended to improve applicability?
- The above learnings will be tested via a limited number of worked examples and summarized in a peer-reviewed publication.
Expert Group Members
| Hans Verhagen - Chair | Food Safety and Nutrition Consultancy | Scientific Regulatory Expert | NL |
| Neil Buck - Vice-Chair | General Mills | Corporate Toxicologist | CH |
| Ana Catarina Carvalho | University of Porto | PhD Student | PT |
| Ricardo Assunçao | IUEM - Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz | Assistant Professor | PT |
| Natalie Thatcher | Mondelēz International | Global Lead for Toxicology | UK |
| Géraldine Boué | ONIRIS | Senior Lecturer in Food Safety | FR |
| Lea Sletting Jakobsen | Technical University of Denmark | Senior Researcher | DK |
| Michele Suman | Barilla G&R Fratell | Head of Food Safety & Authenticity | IT |
| Tanya Huang | Nanyang Technical University | Researcher | SG |
| Gloria Pellegrino | Luigi Lavazza | Scientific Research Manager | IT |
| Sue O'Hagan | PepsiCo | Director of Scientific Affairs | UK |
| Jossie Garthoff | Danone | Global Food Safety Scientific Affairs Leader | NL |
| Alan Boobis | Imperial College London | Emeritus Professor of Toxicology | UK |
Unintentional Substances in Food: Rapid Risk Assessment to inform Risk Management.
| Background and objectives
Food ‘incidents’ occur when there is an unexpected presence of a substance within food that has been produced leading to potential safety concern, either because of regulatory non-compliance or the hazard associated with the substance. As there is no harmonized approach between Food Businesses and other stakeholders on how to perform and communicate a rapid risk assessment, a toolkit will be proposed and provide a systematic approach for risk analysis of incidents, discussing the degree of uncertainties and will be informed by existing scientific guidancesand practical experience of the participants. Risk communication will also be addressed. Output The output will be a toolkit for assessing and communicating health risks associated with food safety incidents (contaminants, residues, ingredients). The toolkit will provide a systematic approach to exposure assessment, risk characterization, and risk assessment, and will be informed by existing scientific guidance and practical experience of the participants.
|
Clarifying the Current Understanding of the Human Health Risk of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Food and Drinking Water to Enable Science-Based Communication and Risk Management
Background and objectives
For a chemical class as diverse as PFAS, a scientifically rigorous approach to risk assessment is needed, and effective communication of uncertainties and data limitations is required. A systematic review of existing publications addressing the aspects of the current chemical grouping approaches for risk assessment would help understand whether it is appropriate for all PFAS to be effectively grouped together for risk management purposes, while also considering the sources and uses of these substances across food supply chains. This would allow for a holistic understanding of hazard and risk to inform a proportionate approach to risk management to maximize the impact of controls for the consumer.
Output
This highly complex and high-profile topic raises questions and challenges in terms of how best to summarize and communicate knowledge for stakeholders. A literature review of the different PFAS families, their toxicological profile and relative potency, and their environmental fate would help assess whether they should be considered for the purpose of mitigation efforts as a number of sub-groups or as a single chemical group. Publications and approaches available to assess PFAS mixtures will also be reviewed, considering relative potency when data are available and sufficiently robust. This work will provide a comprehensive and factual overview of the scientific information on this subject, show the challenges that remain, the avenues of research and propose recommendations for prioritization of risk . Included in the activity would be:
- A systematic review of existing publications (to be carried out by EG with support from an external specialist if needed)
- A draft a summary of the different views on hazard and risk assessment of PFAS
- A proposal for methodological recommendations on how to manage and/or prioritize PFAS in a proportionate manner according to food and drinking water regulations
| Theodoros Varzakas | University of the Peloponnese | GR |
| Sébastien Sauvé | Université de Montréal | CA |
| Deepti Salvi | North Carolina State University | US |
| Neil Buck | General Mills | CH |
| Mathilde Bergal | Danone Nutricia Research | NL |
| Natalie Tatcher | Mondelēz International | GB |
| Michele Suman | Barilla G&R Fratelli | IT |
| Emma Arnesdotter | Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology | LU |
Publications
All Publications
Framework on risk prioritisation of mycotoxins in food: a case study in two wheat-based products
World Mycotoxin Journal, 2025
This manuscript presents a framework for risk prioritisation of mycotoxins in food, integrating hazard assessment, exposure evaluation, and for the first time appraisal of mitigation strategies.
The definition of chemical contaminants in food: Ambiguity and consequences
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2024
Consumers may be exposed via foods to a diverse range of substances that could be considered as contaminants. However, it is not always straightforward to understand the definition of a ‘contaminant’. The present review evaluates how various categories of food-relevant substances are considered in terms of being ‘contaminants’.
The role of endogenous versus exogenous sources in the exposome of putative genotoxins and consequences for risk assessment
Archives of Toxicology, 2022
Commissioned by the Food Contaminants Task Force.
Mineral oil risk assessment: Knowledge gaps and roadmap. Outcome of a multi-stakeholders workshop
Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2021
Commissioned by the Process-Related Compounds & Natural Toxins and the Packaging Materials Task Forces.
Practical Guidance to Mitigation of Mycotoxins During Food Processing
ILSI Europe Report Series, 2019
Commissioned by the Food Contaminants Task Force.
- the lack of validated and standardized analytical methods for relevant food matrices, and
- gaps in assessing the risk for consumers' health.
The consensus is that the lack of standardized, validated analytical methods able to assure good inter-laboratory reproducibility is the main gap underlining most of the existing difficulties to understand MOH.
In order to conduct adequate substance identification and quantification for input into risk assessment, the need for confirmatory methods that provide a detailed characterization of the unresolved complex mixtures needs to be solved.
The limited number of surveys covering a wide range of foods and enough samples to detect major sources of contamination other than packaging in paperboard also hinders reliable exposure estimation.
Decision tree to identify auxilary methods. (Adapted from Bratinova & Hoekstra, 2019)
Industry sectors represented in the workshop
- Food & Drink
- Mineral Oil/Waxes
- Testing Laboratories
- Analytical Instruments
- Food Contact Materials
- Cosmetics
- Petroleum
Read the full-text article here
Scientific abstract Expand BackgroundIn recent years there have been significant advancements in the understanding of mineral oil hydrocarbons (MOH) in foods and their potential risk to health. However, important gaps in knowledge remain, such as the lack of validated and standardized analytical methods for relevant food matrices and gaps in assessing the risk for consumers' health. Scope & approach
A workshop was organized by the European Branch of the International Life Science Institute to identify knowledge gaps in analytical methods, assessment of exposure, hazard characterisation, and risk assessment of MOH. This work captures the outcome of the workshop and builds upon it by combining the perspectives of the participants with an updated review of the literature to provide a roadmap for future management of the topic. Key findings and conclusions
Most participants to the workshop agreed that the key issue underlying many of the knowledge gaps in the field of MOH risk analysis and management is the lack of standardized, validated analytical methods able to assure good inter-laboratory reproducibility and to enable understanding of MOH occurrence in foods. It has been demonstrated that method EN 16995 used for MOH determination in vegetable oils and fats is not reliable below 10 mg/kg of food. There is also a need for confirmatory methods that provide a detailed characterization of the unresolved complex mixture observed from one-dimensional chromatographic methods. This is required to enable adequate substance identification and quantification for input into risk assessment. A major gap in the exposure estimation is the limited number of surveys covering a wide range of foods and enough samples to detect major sources of contamination other than packaging in paperboard. Data on concentration of MOH fractions in human body needed to determine internal exposure estimates is scarce. Data relating concentration in tissues with personal data, lifestyle, food intake and the use of cosmetics are needed to clarify the complex system of distribution of MOSH in the body and to possibly establish relationship between external and internal exposure. Additional toxicological studies to better characterize the hazards of relevant MOH are required for a better human health risk assessment. Keywords Expand
Mineral oil hydrocarbon, Risk assessment, Exposure assessment, Food contaminant, MOSH, MOAH
Number of participants in the workshop 61 from Academica, Public organisations, and Industry. EN 16995 used for MOH determination in vegetable oils and fats is not reliable below 10 mg/kg of food. Main indetified gaps in the knowledge of Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons 8To enable human risk assessment, the performance of toxicological studies on the relevant MOH mixtures and possibly their components is required.
This work was conducted in collaboration with the Packaging Materials Task Force.
[post_title] => Mineral oil risk assessment: Knowledge gaps and roadmap. Outcome of a multi-stakeholders workshop [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => mineral-oil-risk-assessment-knowledge-gaps-and-roadmap-outcome-of-a-multi-stakeholders-workshop [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2023-01-04 16:23:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2023-01-04 16:23:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ilsi.eu/?post_type=publication&p=9231 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => publication [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 6672 [post_author] => 24 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 10:10:48 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 10:10:48 [post_content] => [post_title] => Practical Guidance to Mitigation of Mycotoxins During Food Processing [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => practical-guidance-to-mitigation-of-mycotoxins-during-food-processing [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2023-01-04 16:28:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2023-01-04 16:28:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ilsi.eu/?post_type=publication&p=6672 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => publication [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 5 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 16670 [post_author] => 351 [post_date] => 2025-10-10 10:13:35 [post_date_gmt] => 2025-10-10 10:13:35 [post_content] =>Abstract
In its simplest form, risk is the product of hazard, i.e. toxic potency of a chemical substance, and exposure, or dose. Hazard-based decision-making is based solely on hazard without any consideration of exposure. The development of mitigation strategies should prioritise mycotoxins that regularly occur at undesirable levels in commonly consumed commodities, wherein both the toxicological profiles and effectiveness of mitigation are understood with a reasonable degree of certainty. This manuscript presents a framework for risk prioritisation of mycotoxins in food, integrating hazard assessment, exposure evaluation, and for the first time appraisal of mitigation strategies. More specifically, by (1) identifying the mycotoxins relevant for each food categories, by (2) assigning a severity score for the pivotal effect of each mycotoxin; by (3) calculating the respective food-categories' contributions to the combined exposures and by (4) assessing the existing mitigation strategies, the framework aims to prioritise mycotoxins based on their health risks and potential for effective risk mitigation. As a proof of concept, the framework was applied in two wheat-based food commodities - bread and pasta -, focusing on Ochratoxin A (OTA), Deoxynivalenol (DON), and Zearalenone (ZEN), revealing that OTA in bread is the highest priority concern, followed by DON in bread.
Publication one-pager
Read the full paper
Commissioned by the Food Contaminants Task Force
[post_title] => Framework on risk prioritisation of mycotoxins in food: a case study in two wheat-based products [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => framework-on-risk-prioritisation-of-mycotoxins-in-food-a-case-study-in-two-wheat-based-products [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2025-10-10 10:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2025-10-10 10:23:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ilsi.eu/?post_type=publication&p=16670 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => publication [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 15 [max_num_pages] => 3 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => 1 [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2eaaaf21cc48e2e57d27fd54237a0070 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:152b3327c0573d7a0b461e3ac3a41f6b )Multimedia
One-Pager
Webinars and workshops
Completed Expert Groups
Overview of completed activities
- Process-Related Contaminants as an Example for Holistic Dosimetry of Endogenous and Exogenous Exposures
- Mineral Oil Risk Assessment: Knowledge Gaps and Roadmap (collaboration with Packaging Materials Task Force)
- Food Contaminants Definitions
- Approaches to Facilitiate Application Prioritisation of Natural Toxins for Risk Management
